You are browsing the archive for 2010 June.

Avatar of Daryl

by Daryl

Faulty US Government Oil Spill Models Lingering Legacy of George W. Bush

June 26, 2010 in Blog, News

The Wall Street Journal published a front page story on June 24, 2010 stating that BP relied, per regulatory requirements, on faulty government models of the potential impact of deep water oil drilling accidents. That may be true but the important thing to note is that George W. Bush took the oath of office January 20, 2001.

In 2001, the then-head of the Minerals Management Service (MMS) wrote a paper warning “the oil spill trajectory models currently used by the oil industry for the preparation of oil spill response plans may not be adequate for deep water.”

Since the day George W. Bush took office an abundance of evidence shows he supported oil and gas companies while neglecting his promise made to the American people when he took the oath of office. The most relevant example is that from 2001 to 2005 the Bush administration and the MMS that it installed ignored the warning of outdated models. In 2005, MMS researchers issued a castrated warning calling for “upgraded” response plans. The lack of real teeth or determination behind the second warning is indicative of the support the Bush administration gave the oil industry.

“By early 2002, the Bush administration had tapped a new head of MMS, a former GOP state legislator from Dick Cheney’s home state of Wyoming named Rejane “Johnnie” Burton. Burton, you’ll be shocked to learn, was in the energy industry and in her announcement touted the fact that she “began her career in the oil and gas industry.” It was under her leadership that MMS began to rapidly deteriorate, failing to address even the most basic safety issues for new offshore drilling.” Daily Kos

To further support the oil industry by requiring the industry to prepare response plans according to known outdated models the president gave them a proverbial “get out of jail” card because they could push blame for lack of response back to the government. The harsh truth of this hypothesis is now seeing the light of day.

Avatar of Daryl

by Daryl

My Video Interpreting Committee Service

June 26, 2010 in Blog, Interpreting, Management, Video Relay

Avatar of Daryl

by Daryl

My Degree

June 26, 2010 in Blog, Interpreting, Management

Avatar of Daryl

by Daryl

My Certifications

June 26, 2010 in Interpreting

Avatar of Daryl

by Daryl

Corporations Final Finale…

June 19, 2010 in Blog, Law School

I completed my final for Corporations today and now I can say that I am done with the toughest class of school so far. Because of the topics and how close to home they hit with minority shareholder freezeouts it made it very difficult to study sometimes. However, I refuse to allow those who will go unnamed here to stop my legal education.

Avatar of Daryl

by Daryl

Law School Outlines

June 19, 2010 in Blog, Law School

Outline Depot

The Starting Point

With 41,480 currently approved outlines available for download, OutlineDepot.com is the most comprehensive source of law school outlines anywhere. If you are looking for law school outlines, regardless of your particular school or university, you’ve come to the right place. Remember, registration is free and more outlines become available every day!

The Exchange System

This database of law school outlines is built on an exchange system. The system allows students to upload their law school outlines (earning 1 credit), and in return, download a law school outline for free (debiting 1 credit). Students with no outlines to upload may purchase credits.

The Elusive Outline

Naturally, most law students will only feel compelled to upload to the database if a desired law outline is already posted. Fight this urge! Upload what you can now and build your credits; they will never expire. In the meantime, the database of law school outlines grows and grows. Be sure to check back repeatedly throughout the semester.

Avatar of Daryl

by Daryl

Updated calendar for booking services

June 18, 2010 in Blog, Interpreting

I just updated the calendar for booking my time for interpreting services. Let me know what you think.

Avatar of Daryl

by Daryl

“Home and Away” Tracks Iraq/Afghanistan Casualties

June 10, 2010 in Blog, News

CNN created a heart-breaking infographic memorializing coalition troops who’ve fallen during the Iraq/Afghanistan war.

Up top, side-by-side time lapse videos reveal where those troops died–and, just as important, where they’re from.

But perhaps more moving–and unique among the various Iraq and Afghanistan infographics we’ve seen–is that the site isn’t meant to be taken in passively: It’s an interactive monument. You can click for details on every soldier that died–and those who knew them can leave notes and messages, so that the entire site can function as a communal memorial.

http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/war.casualties/index.html

Avatar of Daryl

by Daryl

When your employer asks you to write the FCC

June 4, 2010 in Blog, Interpreting, Video Relay

I am surprised to find that an apparent letter writing campaign is being executed by a VRS provider through the interpreters it employs. The form letter does not identify the provider, only that the interpreter works for a provider.

The form letter states, “When you [the FCC] set the VRS rate, you will determine whether America makes progress toward the statutory goals of functional equivalence, nationwide access
and inclusion– or force deaf users to revert to TTY communications. And, you will determine whether VRS fulfills its potential to drive broadband adoption by the deaf, even in the face of poverty and isolation.

Those are some pretty large leaps in logic. Why does the letter stereotype Deaf people as isolated and in poverty?

I don’t question the interpreter’s right to state their opinion but I would question if the interpreters are given enough information to make an informed decision about the relationship between the rate and the viability of VRS generally.

I think it is important that we understand that these kinds of tactics are not done for the benefit of VRS as a whole. They are not done to ensure that interpreter’s do not lose their jobs or face pay reductions. This
type of action is meant to move the public debate towards a specific framing for the benefit of the provider(s).

Also, the message that is heard is as a profession we may be aligned with wasteful spending. Interpreters have no control over executive compensation, marketing, etc. but this kind of broad advocacy is supporting the current regime of costs we do not know or control.

Compare that to the refusal to allow providers to claim the margin of interpreting companies as part of reasonable costs, those costs can be directly accounted for and are directly impacting interpreters because the dis-allowance of cost is being pushed down the line as a price reduction and ultimately forced pay cuts. If we as interpreters are talking about that then there seems to be more grounding for the position.

If you are asked by your employer to write a letter to the FCC please make sure you have all the information and are able to see the data yourself. Remember, the question of executive compensation asked some four years ago has yet to enter the public debate.


Video & Audio Comments are proudly powered by Riffly